‘The devil of overconfidence’; defense against corporate cyber threats explained simply

Being a confident person is pretty much what the corporate world is expecting from you. Because most of the time, training a person to engage in occupational activities is so much easier than inducing confidence to them. But the downside of this is that, sometimes, people are quite over confident.

There are several psychology-based researches that have pinpointed that being overconfident is a symbol of insecurity. The fragility alone will be the reason why you will have to suffer the consequences that you assumed wouldn’t matter. When it comes to the context of corporate cyber security perspective, this can be the one single and the most critical reason why your business falls overnight. How so?

Let us take a simple example. There is no doubt that almost all of your company funds can be deal with in an online banking way, or simply in a way that a person could interfere if they had the right tools to do so. What would happen if you had a considerable amount of funds looted, just because a simple mistake in the cyber space? This is just a very generalized loss that can happen, just because you are overconfident about the employees.

Another example that represents this dire devil of overconfidence is when you do not invest in the right encrypting, especially in corporate communication. Companies always come across important online video meetings, discussions and whatnot that can be severe if there was an ear that is clearly not there for good. Being overconfident about the encryption can be more dangerous in 2020s, than you think.

Being overconfident about the defense provided by software-based or network-based solutions can be one massive mistake not only in the corporate context, but also in the personal context as well. There is no doubt that your pro or premium antivirus programs are doing a great job. But there can be several other ways how outsiders could easily get it. Disregarding clear threats like this would be one of the heaviest regrets. The simple solution is of two steps;

#1 Assessment of the existing situation

The first step is what happens with penetration testing in Australia. The idea here is simple; if the whole defense system is quite solid against all kinds of hacking and so, it should withstand one real time. If a group of professionally qualified ethical hackers could get it, it would be able to be done for an unethical one as well. Usually, a process like this would have several aspects such as in terms of mobile apps, networks, web pages and so on.

#2 Filling the missing requirements

The simple idea is that, if you do not know the existing condition, your solution may fall short or overdo, which may be waste of funds. With the ideal reports, conclusions and recommendations, you will be able to fulfil the requirements. What matters here is the professional opinions and solutions in case sensitive methods, which is the right way.